Marie Noe

VICTIMS: 8


Arthur and Marie Noe had ten children that died, the following is a small report on each child, it is taken from an online newspaper that I unfortunately can't remember the title, or URL, of so cannot give credit to, but I tried, so if you wrote this, don't sue me please.

------------------

Richard Allen, born March 7, 1949. Died a month later. His mother told police she last saw him alive, sleeping in his crib, where his father found him dead when he got home from work. No autopsy was performed. Death attributed to congestive heart failure.

Elizabeth Mary, born Sept. 8, 1950. Died five months later. Mother said she found her in her crib vomiting milk and blood. An autopsy was performed, but not clear whether she was examined internally. Cause of death ruled as bronchopneumonia.

Jacqueline, born April 23, 1952. Died 21 days later. Mother said she found her blue and vomiting. Autopsy performed; coroner ruled she choked on vomit.

Arthur Jr., born April 23, 1955. Twelve days later, mother brought him to hospital saying he couldn't breathe. He was found healthy and discharged. The next day, he died. Cause of death ruled as bronchopneumonia.

Constance, born Feb. 24, 1958. Hospitalized at one month after mother complained she was having breathing difficulty. Discharged as healthy. Two days later, father found her dead in her crib. Cause of death: undetermined.

Letitia, delivered stillborn at 39 weeks on Aug. 24, 1959.

Mary Lee, born June 19, 1962. Kept in the hospital for one month for observation. Once she was home, mother called doctor repeatedly to say she was "getting on her nerves" with constant crying. On Jan. 4, 1963, mother, then three-months pregnant, said she found child turning blue. Cause of death: undetermined.

Theresa, born prematurely in late June 1963. Died six hours after birth.

Catherine Ellen, born Dec. 3, 1964. Kept in hospital three months for observation. Mother complained of difficulty feeding her. Nurse reported overhearing mother say, "You better take this or I'll kill you!" during one feeding session. In August 1965, mother reported finding baby with dry-cleaning bag over her head. She was not seriously injured. Hospitalized on two other occasions when mother reported she quit breathing. Released as healthy both times. Found dead in her crib on Feb. 25, 1966. Cause of death: undetermined.

Arthur Joseph, born July 28, 1967. Hospitalized two months for observation. Hospitalized at one month when mother reported he turned blue. Five weeks later, hospitalized again when mother reported finding cat lying on his face. Found dead in his crib in January 1968. Cause of death: undetermined.

------------------

I guess you could say that the Noe's were pretty unlucky people. I reckon the local police and doctors must have thought so too since neither were charged with any crime until 1998, when Marie Noe finally developed a conscience and admitted her deeds.

So, between 1949 and 1968, 10 children die. Two were undeniably natural causes, but in eight of the cases, Mrs. Noe was home alone with the children and she claimed they died in their sleep. I guess it was a case of "a woman wouldn't do something like that." I bet if it was Arthur Noe at home alone with the kids he would have never got past one murder. But I digress.

Actually I'm being a little hard on the police in the area because although doctors attributed each fatality to "crib death," they never actually closed the investigation into the deaths.

But it wasn't police that broke the story, it was a book on SIDS, titled "The Death of Innocents," which profiled the Noe case, and gained it enough attention for a reporter, who worked for Philadelphia Magazine, Stephen Fried, to begin his own inquiry into the deaths. In January 1998, Fried took his questions to the police homicide unit. Sgt. Larry Nodiff, head of the special investigations squad, became intrigued and agreed to "wake up" the long-dormant case.

And under repeated questioning about her constant misfortune when it came to kids I guess Marie Now just cracked and decided it was time to admit to the killings.

It was March 1998 when she gave it up. Noe told police that she had used pillows to kill at least three of her children. But she could not explain why. "All I can figure is that I'm ungodly sick," she told detectives. "I never had the money to get help, and I didn't know where to go for help anyway."

She told homicide detectives Steven Vivarina and John McDermott on March 25 that she killed four of the children but said she had no memory of how the other four died. Marie said was alone each time she killed a child, beginning with Richard on April 7, 1949, and ending with Arthur Joseph on Jan. 2, 1968.

"They all seemed to go very fast. . .," Noe told one investigator.

In true serial killer style Marie Noe also enjoyed publicity. In the 1960s, she willingly cooperated with media interest in her family's strange story. She had garnered "tons of attention," such as her photograph in the old Life magazine as part of an article on crib death - that she had memorialised in scrapbooks. So don't go thinking this is just some old granny who couldn't handle the whole post-natal depression thing.

Just to show you how cold she could be here is some of what she told police:

"He was always crying. He couldn't tell me what was bothering him. He just kept crying. . . . There was a pillow under his face. . . . I took my hand and pressed his face down into the pillow until he stopped moving." Noe tells how she murdered her first-born, Richard, one month after his birth in 1949.

Two years later, she killed her second child, Elizabeth, age 5 months. "She was in the basinet. I put her on her back, and then I took a pillow from the bed and put the pillow over her face and suffocated her. She was fussing. Elizabeth was a lot stronger than Richard was, and she was fighting when the pillow was over her face. I held the pillow over her face until she stopped moving."

"I was trying to train her on how to sit up in the chair. I don't know why, but then I took a pillow and laid her down on the chair, and I suffocated her." This was about Constance, who died in 1958, at the ripe old age of 1 month.

At her bail hearing in August, 1999, the Assistant D.A., Jay Feinschi, called her "as much a mass murderer as Ted Bundy." But this didn’t stop the Judge feeling sorry for the old lady, as he allowed a plea bargain between prosecutor and defence attorneys to stand allowing Mrs. Noe, who was described by the defence as not having "a heart of a killer," to leave the court a basically free woman. "This is one of those situations that makes us human," he said. "Some things happen in life that we cannot understand."

So decades after taking eight lives, 70-year-old Marie Noe was allowed to plead guilty to murder then placed under house arrest as part of the plea bargain that does not require her to serve a day in prison.

And it's not only the police who have let her off lightly, in an interview last year, Arthur Noe defended his wife saying that "I've lived with this woman for 50 years. She was my life. That woman was not capable of doing such a thing. She wouldn't harm a fly." It’s good to see Arthur’s dealing with the news well then.

Actually I must now congratulate the law enforcement (or whoever it was that come up with the following idea) for having the intelligence to come up with a way for Marie Noe to spend her time in the future. Under the deal struck with prosecutors, Noe must meet at least monthly with court-appointed psychiatrists to try to figure out her motive for murder. Noe said she wanted to "confront" her responsibility for the deaths of her children and to discover "the causes of my repeated acts of infanticide. . . killing my children." A press release said that "She wishes to cooperate with medical science to explore why this type of tragedy occurs. She would like to help doctors assist other mothers who may be prone to infanticide."

I must say that this is one of the most forward thinking decisions to ever come out of that stinking hole that is America.

And one last thing (for those who are still questioning whether or not Mrs. Noe deserves this space) she did not shed one single tear at any court hearings, or during any interviews. Now that is the action of someone worthy of their space at the Wacky World of Murder.

 


MY OPINION

First up I'd like to say that this really is an amazing case. I mean, how many women can score 8? But to more important things. If it were Arthur Noe that was guilty of these crimes do you think they would allow him to go free? I highly doubt it. So what we have here is a case of sexism taken to the most extreme. Pretty bloody disgraceful if you ask me. It's a shame such an incredible case has to be ruined by this complete double standard. But if we forget about that (which I have trouble doing) then it is unarguably one of the most interesting cases to come out last year. I can't wait to get a well researched book on Mrs. Noe.