Alternatives to Detention
Home - Task - Process - Resources - Evaluation - Conclusion - Teaching Notes
Evaluation Rubric for Panel Discussion:
Student’s Name: _________________________________
Student’s Role: _______________________________
Communication |
Beginning
|
Developing
|
Good
|
Excellent |
|
|
Coherence of argument suffers from many grammatical errors.
|
Still require a lot of work on the part of the listener to understand. |
Errors do not interfere with the meaning – listening stress is less. |
Few grammatical errors and no stress on the part of the listener. |
|
Pronunciation |
Errors interfere strongly with meaning. Very difficult to follow.
|
Errors still require a lot of work on the part of the listener to understand. |
Errors do not interfere with the meaning – listening stress is less. |
Pronunciation is good with few or no errors. Easy to listen to. |
|
|
Speaker unable to find appropriate words to convey clear meanings.
|
Speaker still grasping at use of appropriate vocabulary |
Speaker has enough word attack to convey general meaning. |
Speaker able to find appropriate vocabulary with ease. |
|
Well
organised oral text with staging |
Arguments not staged – no logical development.
|
Arguments partially staged, but sequencing is still confusing. |
Arguments staged well, and most developed logically. |
Arguments well staged and developed logically. |
|
Gives information with supporting evidence |
|
|
Usually supports argument with evidence. |
Always supports argument with evidence. |
|
Demonstrates
understanding of other panellists’ views/able to clarify |
Never asks other panellists for clarification, or makes a comment on their argument.
|
Makes short, simple comments on other panellists’ arguments. |
Attempts more detailed clarification or comments on other panellists’ arguments. |
Can formulate precise comments and clarification of other panellists’ arguments. |
Home - Task - Process - Resources - Evaluation - Conclusion - Teaching Notes - Credits