-
Boyle goes on to destructively criticize Earth, Water, Air and Fire as having no real validity whatsoever in explaining the physical world around us. He dogmatically denies the metaphysical and philosophical ideas that he acknowledged were based upon them. In his frustration to understand them, he put forward his new definition instead:
I now mean by
Elements, as those Chymists that speak plainest by their Principles, certain
Primitive and Simple, or perfectly unmingled bodies; which not being made
of any other bodies, or of one another, are the Ingredients of which all
the perfectly mixt Bodies are immediately compounded, and into to which
they are intimately resolved.
In this rather convoluted definition,
it can clearly be seen that an element is no longer one of the universal
forces upon which life depends; instead it is defined as a unit of material
composition that cannot be broken down further. If a substance can
be broken down into constituent parts, then from this definition it cannot
be considered an element.
|